Physical Packages
Notes:
A: Only relevant if using the content type mapping strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.
B: Only relevant if supporting the interleaving strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.
ID |
Rule |
Reference |
Package Implementer |
Format Designer |
Format Producer |
Format Consumer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S2.1 |
Some physical package formats have a native mechanism for representing content types. For such packages, the package implementer should use the native mechanism to map the content type for a part. |
× |
||||
S2.2 |
If no native method of mapping a content type to a part exists, the package implementer should include a specially-named XML stream in the package called the Content Types stream |
× |
||||
S2.3 |
If the package is intended for streaming consumption: The package implementer should not allow The format producer should write the |
×A |
×A |
|||
S2.4 |
×B |
|||||
S2.5 |
The package implementer should store pieces in their natural order for optimal efficiency. |
×B |
Notes:
A: Only relevant if using the content type mapping strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.
B: Only relevant if supporting the interleaving strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.
ID |
Rule |
Reference |
Package Implementer |
Format Designer |
Format Producer |
Format Consumer |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O2.1 |
The format designer specifies whether that format might use interleaving. |
× |
||||
O2.2 |
× |
|||||
O2.3 |
× |
|||||
O2.4 |
×A |
|||||
O2.5 |
The package implementer can define Default content type mappings even though no parts use them. |
×A |
||||
O2.6 |
× |
|||||
O2.7 |
×B |
Notes:
A: Only relevant if using the content type mapping strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.
B: Only relevant if supporting the interleaving strategy specified in the Open Packaging Conventions.